Hi, I'm Philipp!
A web developer who suffers
from secondhand smoking.
I made this site to help other sufferers.
And myself.
18 people said its effective against smoke! 6 said it isn't.
Users generally found it effective at reducing smoke, but some noted it takes longer for heavy smoke or persistent odors.
View on Amazon (paid link)
12 people said its effective against smoke! 5 said it isn't.
People said it performs moderately well with smoke, but may require more time to clear the air in larger spaces.
View on Amazon (paid link)
33 people said its effective against smoke! 1 said it isn't.
People said its extremely effective at removing smoke, even in dense conditions, with fast purification times.
View on Amazon (paid link)
I've analysed some air purifiers' reviews on Amazon
and found the ones where people said they worked well
against secondhand smoke.
Each of these links is an associate link.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Help me help you.
*Amazon is a company, not a woman.
The claim that even many smokers don't enjoy the smell of secondhand smoke might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, it finds support in various studies and real-world observations that highlight the complex psychological and physiological relationships smokers have with cigarette smoke.
Research has shown that while smokers are accustomed to direct smoke inhalation, many repo...
The hypothetical scenario of smokers emitting bubbles instead of smoke opens an intriguing discussion about social acceptance and perception. Smoking, often frowned upon due to its health implications and unpleasant smell, leaves a negative mark on social interactions. However, replacing smoke with harmless, transparent bubbles could drastically alter this perception.
First, we must cons...
Being constantly exposed to secondhand smoke is not only a physical health concern but can also be a mental health burden. The idea of ignoring or "not noticing" secondhand smoke through psychological tricks is an interesting one. Studies have shown that cognitive behavioral strategies can sometimes help individuals alter their perception of certain stimuli, but can these methods exte...
When comparing the effects of a diesel generator operating inside an apartment to a smoking grandmother, the risks are significant in both scenarios but differ in scale and impact. Both can lead to a poor indoor air quality environment, which has been linked to adverse health effects.
A diesel generator inside an apartment introduces a high level of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter (PM), and other hazardous pollutants. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) warns that these emissions can cause serious health issues, including respiratory problems, cardiovascular diseases, and in extreme cases, even death due to carbon monoxide poisoning. For example, a study published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) highlighted several instances where indoor use of diesel generators led to fatalities due to CO exposure.
On the other hand, secondhand smoke from a smoking grandmother, while less immediately lethal compared to diesel emissions, poses long-term health risks. The American Lung Association notes that exposure to secondhand smoke causes approximately 41,000 deaths per year among nonsmoking adults and increases the risks of developing lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory illnesses. A famous study by the California Environmental Protection Agency estimated that nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke have a 25-30% increased risk of heart disease.
In real-world scenarios, mitigating the problems of secondhand smoke typically involves solutions like improving ventilation or using air purifiers. In case of mentioning relevant air purifiers, products such as the Blueair Blue Pure 221 Air Purifier (paid link) can be effective at reducing the levels of PM from cigarette smoke. However, combating diesel generator emissions requires more significant interventions due to the severity of pollutants involved, including finding alternate power solutions or ensuring the generator is placed well outside any living space.
Ultimately, while both scenarios pose serious health hazards, the immediate dangers posed by a diesel generator indoors are more severe due to its acute toxicity potential, whereas the smoking grandmother represents a chronic health risk.