Hi, I'm Philipp!
A web developer who suffers
from secondhand smoking.
I made this site to help other sufferers.
And myself.
18 people said its effective against smoke! 6 said it isn't.
Users generally found it effective at reducing smoke, but some noted it takes longer for heavy smoke or persistent odors.
View on Amazon (paid link)
12 people said its effective against smoke! 5 said it isn't.
People said it performs moderately well with smoke, but may require more time to clear the air in larger spaces.
View on Amazon (paid link)
33 people said its effective against smoke! 1 said it isn't.
People said its extremely effective at removing smoke, even in dense conditions, with fast purification times.
View on Amazon (paid link)
I've analysed some air purifiers' reviews on Amazon
and found the ones where people said they worked well
against secondhand smoke.
Each of these links is an associate link.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Help me help you.
*Amazon is a company, not a woman.
The claim that even many smokers don't enjoy the smell of secondhand smoke might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, it finds support in various studies and real-world observations that highlight the complex psychological and physiological relationships smokers have with cigarette smoke.
Research has shown that while smokers are accustomed to direct smoke inhalation, many repo...
The hypothetical scenario of smokers emitting bubbles instead of smoke opens an intriguing discussion about social acceptance and perception. Smoking, often frowned upon due to its health implications and unpleasant smell, leaves a negative mark on social interactions. However, replacing smoke with harmless, transparent bubbles could drastically alter this perception.
First, we must cons...
Being constantly exposed to secondhand smoke is not only a physical health concern but can also be a mental health burden. The idea of ignoring or "not noticing" secondhand smoke through psychological tricks is an interesting one. Studies have shown that cognitive behavioral strategies can sometimes help individuals alter their perception of certain stimuli, but can these methods exte...
If aliens visited Earth and discovered that humans engaged in smoking, their reaction might be one of bewilderment, especially when viewed through the lens of scientific inquiry and psychological understanding. Smoking, particularly of tobacco, has been practiced by humans for centuries and is deeply embedded in many cultures. Yet, from an outsider's perspective, the conscious inhalation of substances known to harm health could seem perplexing.
Imagine an alien species with advanced capabilities for understanding biology and medicine. They might quickly grasp the detrimental effects of smoking from a physiological standpoint. Studies on Earth have repeatedly shown that tobacco smoke contains numerous toxic substances, such as nicotine, tar, and carbon monoxide. These have been extensively linked to health issues like lung cancer, emphysema, and cardiovascular diseases. According to a study by the World Health Organization, there are more than 7 million smoking-related deaths worldwide each year, illustrating the scale of smoking's impact on human health.
From a psychological perspective, the aliens might be curious about why humans continue to smoke despite knowing the risks. Various studies suggest that smoking is strongly linked to the addiction properties of nicotine, a substance that can affect neurotransmitter levels in the brain and cause dependency. A study published in the 'Journal of Neuroscience' revealed how nicotine changes the brain's wiring and makes quitting challenging for smokers, which might intrigue alien visitors interested in psychology and neurology. Furthermore, they might find it interesting how smoking is intertwined with social and cultural facets, such as the influence of marketing, peer pressure, and cultural norms, which can sometimes overpower public health messages.
The aliens might compare this scenario with similar practices in other intelligent life forms they may have encountered, if any. They might draw parallels to other known intelligent beings who exhibit self-destructive behaviors, investigating the sociocultural and possibly evolutionary components that contribute to such phenomena. Their reaction to smoking could involve a desire to understand why beings capable of complex thought and technological advancement would tolerate and perpetuate such a harmful practice, possibly sparking a larger dialogue about the intricacies of human behavior and societal structures.