Hi, I'm Philipp!
A web developer who suffers
from secondhand smoking.
I made this site to help other sufferers.
And myself.
18 people said its effective against smoke! 6 said it isn't.
Users generally found it effective at reducing smoke, but some noted it takes longer for heavy smoke or persistent odors.
View on Amazon (paid link)
12 people said its effective against smoke! 5 said it isn't.
People said it performs moderately well with smoke, but may require more time to clear the air in larger spaces.
View on Amazon (paid link)
33 people said its effective against smoke! 1 said it isn't.
People said its extremely effective at removing smoke, even in dense conditions, with fast purification times.
View on Amazon (paid link)
I've analysed some air purifiers' reviews on Amazon
and found the ones where people said they worked well
against secondhand smoke.
Each of these links is an associate link.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Help me help you.
*Amazon is a company, not a woman.
The claim that even many smokers don't enjoy the smell of secondhand smoke might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, it finds support in various studies and real-world observations that highlight the complex psychological and physiological relationships smokers have with cigarette smoke.
Research has shown that while smokers are accustomed to direct smoke inhalation, many repo...
The hypothetical scenario of smokers emitting bubbles instead of smoke opens an intriguing discussion about social acceptance and perception. Smoking, often frowned upon due to its health implications and unpleasant smell, leaves a negative mark on social interactions. However, replacing smoke with harmless, transparent bubbles could drastically alter this perception.
First, we must cons...
Being constantly exposed to secondhand smoke is not only a physical health concern but can also be a mental health burden. The idea of ignoring or "not noticing" secondhand smoke through psychological tricks is an interesting one. Studies have shown that cognitive behavioral strategies can sometimes help individuals alter their perception of certain stimuli, but can these methods exte...
The term 'secondhand vaping' refers to the exposure to aerosol (commonly known as vapor) produced by e-cigarettes when someone else is vaping nearby. While vaping is generally considered to release fewer harmful substances compared to traditional cigarette smoke, it still emits a mix of chemicals into the air. This raises concerns about the potential health impacts on bystanders, similar to those of secondhand cigarette smoke.
Unlike traditional cigarette smoke, which contains thousands of harmful chemicals including known carcinogens like tar and carbon monoxide, e-cigarette vapor primarily consists of nicotine, propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, and flavorings. Some studies have indicated that secondhand vapor contains lower levels of harmful substances compared to cigarette smoke. However, it does include fine and ultrafine particles, heavy metals, and other toxicants, albeit in significantly lower concentrations.
The health impacts of secondhand vaping are not fully understood yet, partly due to the relatively short time that e-cigarettes have been on the market compared to traditional cigarettes. Current research suggests that while the risks of secondhand vaping may be lower than those associated with cigarette smoke, there is still potential for harm, especially to vulnerable populations such as children, pregnant women, and those with pre-existing respiratory conditions.
As the use of e-cigarettes continues to rise, more research is needed to fully understand and evaluate the long-term health effects of secondhand vapor exposure. Until comprehensive data is available, public health policies and personal decisions regarding vaping in shared spaces remain subject to ongoing debate and investigation.