Hi, I'm Philipp!
A web developer who suffers
from secondhand smoking.
I made this site to help other sufferers.
And myself.
18 people said its effective against smoke! 6 said it isn't.
Users generally found it effective at reducing smoke, but some noted it takes longer for heavy smoke or persistent odors.
View on Amazon (paid link)
12 people said its effective against smoke! 5 said it isn't.
People said it performs moderately well with smoke, but may require more time to clear the air in larger spaces.
View on Amazon (paid link)
33 people said its effective against smoke! 1 said it isn't.
People said its extremely effective at removing smoke, even in dense conditions, with fast purification times.
View on Amazon (paid link)
I've analysed some air purifiers' reviews on Amazon
and found the ones where people said they worked well
against secondhand smoke.
Each of these links is an associate link.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Help me help you.
*Amazon is a company, not a woman.
The claim that even many smokers don't enjoy the smell of secondhand smoke might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, it finds support in various studies and real-world observations that highlight the complex psychological and physiological relationships smokers have with cigarette smoke.
Research has shown that while smokers are accustomed to direct smoke inhalation, many repo...
The hypothetical scenario of smokers emitting bubbles instead of smoke opens an intriguing discussion about social acceptance and perception. Smoking, often frowned upon due to its health implications and unpleasant smell, leaves a negative mark on social interactions. However, replacing smoke with harmless, transparent bubbles could drastically alter this perception.
First, we must cons...
Being constantly exposed to secondhand smoke is not only a physical health concern but can also be a mental health burden. The idea of ignoring or "not noticing" secondhand smoke through psychological tricks is an interesting one. Studies have shown that cognitive behavioral strategies can sometimes help individuals alter their perception of certain stimuli, but can these methods exte...
In recent years, advancements in home automation technology have sparked interest in integrating various systems to enhance safety and convenience. One intriguing concept is the idea of smoke detectors that are capable of automatically closing windows when smoke is detected. Such systems could provide an added layer of protection in the event of a fire, potentially slowing the spread of smoke and flames by limiting the availability of oxygen and keeping hazardous smoke from entering the building.
Technically, the integration of smoke detectors with automatic window closing systems is feasible with existing technologies. Smart home systems already offer the ability to connect various devices, such as smart thermostats, lighting, and security systems, through central hubs or smart platforms. By extending this interconnectivity to include window actuators and smart smoke detectors, it is possible to create a system where smoke detection triggers the closing of windows.
For example, automated window actuators can be installed to control window openings and closings remotely. These actuators can be programmed to respond to signals from a smart smoke detector, which detects smoke and sends a signal to the window control system to close the windows. This setup can be particularly useful for homes or buildings located in areas prone to wildfires or where external air quality may fluctuate due to environmental factors.
While the concept is promising, there are practical considerations to address. Both the smoke detector and window mechanisms need to be reliable and properly installed to ensure they function correctly in an emergency. Additionally, homeowners would need to ensure that such systems are regularly tested and maintained, much like traditional smoke detectors and fire safety systems.