Hi, I'm Philipp!
A web developer who suffers
from secondhand smoking.
I made this site to help other sufferers.
And myself.
18 people said its effective against smoke! 6 said it isn't.
Users generally found it effective at reducing smoke, but some noted it takes longer for heavy smoke or persistent odors.
View on Amazon (paid link)
12 people said its effective against smoke! 5 said it isn't.
People said it performs moderately well with smoke, but may require more time to clear the air in larger spaces.
View on Amazon (paid link)
33 people said its effective against smoke! 1 said it isn't.
People said its extremely effective at removing smoke, even in dense conditions, with fast purification times.
View on Amazon (paid link)
I've analysed some air purifiers' reviews on Amazon
and found the ones where people said they worked well
against secondhand smoke.
Each of these links is an associate link.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Help me help you.
*Amazon is a company, not a woman.
The claim that even many smokers don't enjoy the smell of secondhand smoke might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, it finds support in various studies and real-world observations that highlight the complex psychological and physiological relationships smokers have with cigarette smoke.
Research has shown that while smokers are accustomed to direct smoke inhalation, many repo...
The hypothetical scenario of smokers emitting bubbles instead of smoke opens an intriguing discussion about social acceptance and perception. Smoking, often frowned upon due to its health implications and unpleasant smell, leaves a negative mark on social interactions. However, replacing smoke with harmless, transparent bubbles could drastically alter this perception.
First, we must cons...
Being constantly exposed to secondhand smoke is not only a physical health concern but can also be a mental health burden. The idea of ignoring or "not noticing" secondhand smoke through psychological tricks is an interesting one. Studies have shown that cognitive behavioral strategies can sometimes help individuals alter their perception of certain stimuli, but can these methods exte...
Secondhand smoke is a significant concern for many, especially given its harmful health effects. From a psychological perspective, the idea of training oneself to ignore certain stimuli is not new. In cognitive psychology, this is related to the concept of selective attention, where individuals focus on certain stimuli in their environment while excluding others. However, actively training your brain to ignore secondhand smoke is more complex due to its composition of harmful chemicals that can affect both physical and mental health.
Exposure to secondhand smoke is linked to numerous health risks, including respiratory problems and increased cancer risk. Psychological tricks to ignore such exposure might involve mental distraction techniques like focusing on a different sensory experience, such as listening to music or engaging in a conversation. While these techniques might help some individuals temporarily divert attention, they do not eliminate the health risks associated with inhaling toxic smoke.
Concerning mental health, the stress and anxiety associated with unwanted exposure to secondhand smoke can be significant. Here, temporarily avoiding sensory processing of smoke might provide some mental relief, but it's crucial to recognize that this doesn't mitigate physical harm. Ultimately, the better choice for health, both physical and mental, would be reducing exposure wherever possible.