Hi, I'm Philipp!
A web developer who suffers
from secondhand smoking.
I made this site to help other sufferers.
And myself.
18 people said its effective against smoke! 6 said it isn't.
Users generally found it effective at reducing smoke, but some noted it takes longer for heavy smoke or persistent odors.
View on Amazon (paid link)
12 people said its effective against smoke! 5 said it isn't.
People said it performs moderately well with smoke, but may require more time to clear the air in larger spaces.
View on Amazon (paid link)
33 people said its effective against smoke! 1 said it isn't.
People said its extremely effective at removing smoke, even in dense conditions, with fast purification times.
View on Amazon (paid link)
I've analysed some air purifiers' reviews on Amazon
and found the ones where people said they worked well
against secondhand smoke.
Each of these links is an associate link.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Help me help you.
*Amazon is a company, not a woman.
The claim that even many smokers don't enjoy the smell of secondhand smoke might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, it finds support in various studies and real-world observations that highlight the complex psychological and physiological relationships smokers have with cigarette smoke.
Research has shown that while smokers are accustomed to direct smoke inhalation, many repo...
The hypothetical scenario of smokers emitting bubbles instead of smoke opens an intriguing discussion about social acceptance and perception. Smoking, often frowned upon due to its health implications and unpleasant smell, leaves a negative mark on social interactions. However, replacing smoke with harmless, transparent bubbles could drastically alter this perception.
First, we must cons...
Being constantly exposed to secondhand smoke is not only a physical health concern but can also be a mental health burden. The idea of ignoring or "not noticing" secondhand smoke through psychological tricks is an interesting one. Studies have shown that cognitive behavioral strategies can sometimes help individuals alter their perception of certain stimuli, but can these methods exte...
Secondhand smoke, the smoke exhaled by a smoker or emitted from the burning end of a cigarette, can accumulate in unexpected places, revealing just how pervasive it can be. While most people are aware of its presence in enclosed spaces like homes and cars, research indicates that secondhand smoke can linger in areas you might never suspect.
One surprising location where secondhand smoke accumulates is in multi-unit housing such as apartment buildings. Studies have shown that smoke can travel through cracks in walls, shared ventilation systems, and even electrical outlets. A study published in the journal 'Nicotine & Tobacco Research' in 2011 demonstrated that non-smoking units in such buildings can have comparable levels of smoke to those in which smoking occurs.
Another unexpected place includes outdoor areas, particularly where smokers congregate, like outside of buildings and in public parks. According to a study conducted by Stanford University, outdoor levels of secondhand smoke can exceed the thresholds set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for fine particulate matter, particularly downwind and in crowded spaces.
Vehicles are also notorious for trapping secondhand smoke. Even with windows down, the concentration of harmful chemicals can be significant. Research highlights that these confined environments may expose passengers, especially children, to toxins at levels higher than those found in some smoke-filled bars.
Furthermore, places such as public transport shelters and bus stops, even when they are roofless, can trap smoke due to limited air circulation. The design of these shelters can inadvertently create pockets of concentrated smoke, posing a risk to non-smokers waiting in the same area.
Finally, thirdhand smoke, the residue left on surfaces, adds another layer to this issue. This toxic residue can build up in non-smoking areas and objects like hotel rooms and rental cars, long after the smoker has gone. These residues can react with common indoor pollutants to form cancer-causing compounds, as outlined in studies from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. This research points to the fact that even surfaces that appear clean can harbor health risks long after the smoke has dissipated.