Hi, I'm Philipp!
A web developer who suffers
from secondhand smoking.
I made this site to help other sufferers.
And myself.
18 people said its effective against smoke! 6 said it isn't.
Users generally found it effective at reducing smoke, but some noted it takes longer for heavy smoke or persistent odors.
View on Amazon (paid link)
12 people said its effective against smoke! 5 said it isn't.
People said it performs moderately well with smoke, but may require more time to clear the air in larger spaces.
View on Amazon (paid link)
33 people said its effective against smoke! 1 said it isn't.
People said its extremely effective at removing smoke, even in dense conditions, with fast purification times.
View on Amazon (paid link)
I've analysed some air purifiers' reviews on Amazon
and found the ones where people said they worked well
against secondhand smoke.
Each of these links is an associate link.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Help me help you.
*Amazon is a company, not a woman.
The claim that even many smokers don't enjoy the smell of secondhand smoke might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, it finds support in various studies and real-world observations that highlight the complex psychological and physiological relationships smokers have with cigarette smoke.
Research has shown that while smokers are accustomed to direct smoke inhalation, many repo...
The hypothetical scenario of smokers emitting bubbles instead of smoke opens an intriguing discussion about social acceptance and perception. Smoking, often frowned upon due to its health implications and unpleasant smell, leaves a negative mark on social interactions. However, replacing smoke with harmless, transparent bubbles could drastically alter this perception.
First, we must cons...
Being constantly exposed to secondhand smoke is not only a physical health concern but can also be a mental health burden. The idea of ignoring or "not noticing" secondhand smoke through psychological tricks is an interesting one. Studies have shown that cognitive behavioral strategies can sometimes help individuals alter their perception of certain stimuli, but can these methods exte...
The presence of secondhand smoke in public parks has become an increasingly discussed topic, with many questioning its potential health hazards even in outdoor settings. Although fresh air might dilute cigarette smoke, studies suggest that secondhand smoke can still pose health risks in outdoor environments, particularly in areas where people gather, such as parks.
Research conducted by Stanford University revealed that the concentration of secondhand smoke can be significant at close distances outdoors. For instance, the levels of pollution can be comparable to those found near busy highways. Another study published in the Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association found that under certain conditions, outdoor secondhand smoke exposure could be substantial enough to warrant concern, especially in tightly packed areas or where smokers congregate.
Children are particularly vulnerable to secondhand smoke, even in outdoor settings. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified secondhand smoke as a Group A carcinogen, indicating it is a known cause of cancer in humans. The risk is not limited to cancer; exposure can also exacerbate asthma and allergies. In fact, a study by the CDC highlighted that even brief exposure can bring about adverse cardiovascular effects, making the topic of secondhand smoke in public spaces an important public health issue.
Addressing the issue of secondhand smoke in outdoor public parks can be challenging. Several cities worldwide, such as New York City and San Francisco, have implemented smoking bans in parks to combat this problem. These bans are designed to protect non-smoking park-goers from unwanted exposure, while also promoting a family-friendly environment.
Another potential solution involves designated smoking areas within parks, positioned away from main activity zones. This approach has been utilized in locations like Chicago's public parks, allowing smokers to enjoy the space without compromising the air quality for others. These measures reflect a growing recognition of the health risks associated with secondhand smoke outdoors and a proactive response to mitigating its effects. As awareness and concern about outdoor air quality continue to rise, discussions around secondhand smoke in public parks remain highly relevant.