Hi, I'm Philipp!
A web developer who suffers
from secondhand smoking.
I made this site to help other sufferers.
And myself.
18 people said its effective against smoke! 6 said it isn't.
Users generally found it effective at reducing smoke, but some noted it takes longer for heavy smoke or persistent odors.
View on Amazon (paid link)
12 people said its effective against smoke! 5 said it isn't.
People said it performs moderately well with smoke, but may require more time to clear the air in larger spaces.
View on Amazon (paid link)
33 people said its effective against smoke! 1 said it isn't.
People said its extremely effective at removing smoke, even in dense conditions, with fast purification times.
View on Amazon (paid link)
I've analysed some air purifiers' reviews on Amazon
and found the ones where people said they worked well
against secondhand smoke.
Each of these links is an associate link.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Help me help you.
*Amazon is a company, not a woman.
The claim that even many smokers don't enjoy the smell of secondhand smoke might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, it finds support in various studies and real-world observations that highlight the complex psychological and physiological relationships smokers have with cigarette smoke.
Research has shown that while smokers are accustomed to direct smoke inhalation, many repo...
The hypothetical scenario of smokers emitting bubbles instead of smoke opens an intriguing discussion about social acceptance and perception. Smoking, often frowned upon due to its health implications and unpleasant smell, leaves a negative mark on social interactions. However, replacing smoke with harmless, transparent bubbles could drastically alter this perception.
First, we must cons...
Being constantly exposed to secondhand smoke is not only a physical health concern but can also be a mental health burden. The idea of ignoring or "not noticing" secondhand smoke through psychological tricks is an interesting one. Studies have shown that cognitive behavioral strategies can sometimes help individuals alter their perception of certain stimuli, but can these methods exte...
The idea that houseplants might protect us from secondhand smoke has intrigued many homeowners seeking natural solutions for cleaner air. This curiosity often stems from a NASA study published in 1989, which explored the potential of indoor plants to remove various airborne toxins. In this study, plants such as the peace lily and snake plant were shown to filter volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the air. However, the question remains as to how effective these plants are at combating secondhand smoke specifically.
Secondhand smoke contains a complex mix of over 7,000 chemicals, many of which are harmful. While plants have some ability to absorb certain VOCs, the effectiveness is relatively limited when it comes to the vast and complex array of chemicals found in cigarette smoke. The capacity of an average houseplant to significantly remove these particles is quite low, especially in the concentrations typically found in smoke-filled environments. Thus, relying solely on plants for protection against secondhand smoke might not be the most efficient approach.
For those looking for a more assured method of filtering smoke particles, technological solutions like air purifiers are far more effective. The Airthereal MA10K-PRO SMART WiFi Ozone Generator (paid link), for example, offers a powerful means to clean indoor air. This product uses advanced filtration technologies to capture and neutralize a wide range of airborne pollutants, including those from smoke. When considering options to improve air quality, such products provide a comprehensive solution compared to the limited capabilities of houseplants. In contrast to natural greenery, these devices are designed specifically to handle significant pollutant loads, making them a preferable choice for those concerned with heavy smoke exposure.