Hi, I'm Philipp!
A web developer who suffers
from secondhand smoking.
I made this site to help other sufferers.
And myself.
18 people said its effective against smoke! 6 said it isn't.
Users generally found it effective at reducing smoke, but some noted it takes longer for heavy smoke or persistent odors.
View on Amazon (paid link)
12 people said its effective against smoke! 5 said it isn't.
People said it performs moderately well with smoke, but may require more time to clear the air in larger spaces.
View on Amazon (paid link)
33 people said its effective against smoke! 1 said it isn't.
People said its extremely effective at removing smoke, even in dense conditions, with fast purification times.
View on Amazon (paid link)
I've analysed some air purifiers' reviews on Amazon
and found the ones where people said they worked well
against secondhand smoke.
Each of these links is an associate link.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Help me help you.
*Amazon is a company, not a woman.
The claim that even many smokers don't enjoy the smell of secondhand smoke might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, it finds support in various studies and real-world observations that highlight the complex psychological and physiological relationships smokers have with cigarette smoke.
Research has shown that while smokers are accustomed to direct smoke inhalation, many repo...
The hypothetical scenario of smokers emitting bubbles instead of smoke opens an intriguing discussion about social acceptance and perception. Smoking, often frowned upon due to its health implications and unpleasant smell, leaves a negative mark on social interactions. However, replacing smoke with harmless, transparent bubbles could drastically alter this perception.
First, we must cons...
Being constantly exposed to secondhand smoke is not only a physical health concern but can also be a mental health burden. The idea of ignoring or "not noticing" secondhand smoke through psychological tricks is an interesting one. Studies have shown that cognitive behavioral strategies can sometimes help individuals alter their perception of certain stimuli, but can these methods extend to ignoring secondhand smoke?
One potential psychological trick involves redirecting your focus or attention. This technique, often employed in mindfulness practices, is based on the idea that by actively focusing on something else, you might be able to reduce the perceived impact of the smoke. For instance, a study on pain management published in the Journal of Pain demonstrated that mindfulness and re-focusing attention can alter the perception of pain. Perhaps similar techniques could be applied to secondhand smoke.
Another study from the European Journal of Social Psychology suggests that cognitive dissonance—a phenomenon where people experience discomfort when they hold two conflicting beliefs—can sometimes lead individuals to alter their perceptions to decrease discomfort. A person who cannot avoid secondhand smoke might, over time, begin to perceive it as less bothersome as a way to resolve the dissonance between their dislike of smoke and the necessity of being in smoking environments.
However, training yourself to ignore harmful environmental factors like secondhand smoke could have mixed outcomes for mental health. While you might reduce stress in social situations by not perceiving the smoke as acutely, there’s also a risk of underlying anxiety or a cognitive strain from forcing yourself to ignore a persistent irritant. This is similar to the phenomenon of "blinding" oneself to clutter in a home, which some studies have found can increase stress when the clutter becomes unavoidable.
Ultimately, while these psychological techniques might provide some relief in the short term, it's important to consider the trade-offs when it comes to mental health impacts. Reducing stress through cognitive strategies can indeed be beneficial, but one must also remain cognizant of any physical harm that might occur from continued exposure. It might be worthwhile to explore whether your environment can be adjusted to reduce exposure actively, rather than entirely relying on psychological methods.