Hi, I'm Philipp!
A web developer who suffers
from secondhand smoking.
I made this site to help other sufferers.
And myself.
18 people said its effective against smoke! 6 said it isn't.
Users generally found it effective at reducing smoke, but some noted it takes longer for heavy smoke or persistent odors.
View on Amazon (paid link)
12 people said its effective against smoke! 5 said it isn't.
People said it performs moderately well with smoke, but may require more time to clear the air in larger spaces.
View on Amazon (paid link)
33 people said its effective against smoke! 1 said it isn't.
People said its extremely effective at removing smoke, even in dense conditions, with fast purification times.
View on Amazon (paid link)
I've analysed some air purifiers' reviews on Amazon
and found the ones where people said they worked well
against secondhand smoke.
Each of these links is an associate link.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Help me help you.
*Amazon is a company, not a woman.
The claim that even many smokers don't enjoy the smell of secondhand smoke might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, it finds support in various studies and real-world observations that highlight the complex psychological and physiological relationships smokers have with cigarette smoke.
Research has shown that while smokers are accustomed to direct smoke inhalation, many repo...
The hypothetical scenario of smokers emitting bubbles instead of smoke opens an intriguing discussion about social acceptance and perception. Smoking, often frowned upon due to its health implications and unpleasant smell, leaves a negative mark on social interactions. However, replacing smoke with harmless, transparent bubbles could drastically alter this perception.
First, we must cons...
Being constantly exposed to secondhand smoke is not only a physical health concern but can also be a mental health burden. The idea of ignoring or "not noticing" secondhand smoke through psychological tricks is an interesting one. Studies have shown that cognitive behavioral strategies can sometimes help individuals alter their perception of certain stimuli, but can these methods exte...
The unpleasantness of cigarette smoke can be attributed to a combination of its chemical composition and the way our bodies react to it. Cigarette smoke contains thousands of chemicals, including nicotine, tar, ammonia, and formaldehyde, many of which have strong, acrid smells that our noses are naturally sensitive to. Humans have evolved to identify and avoid harmful substances, and the sharp, pungent odor of cigarette smoke acts as a signal of potential danger, triggering a reflexive aversion in many individuals.
Additionally, the smell of cigarette smoke may be unpleasant due to its persistence. Smoke particles have a tendency to cling to fabrics, hair, and skin, and their lingering presence can contribute to an ongoing perception of foul odors. For non-smokers, the smell can quickly become overwhelming, as their senses are not desensitized to it.
Psychologically, the smell of cigarette smoke can be associated with negative health effects, such as respiratory issues and an increased risk of cancer. Cultural shifts and public health campaigns have also played a role in shaping perceptions, with the smell often carrying connotations of pollution and uncleanliness in modern society. As a result, the smell of cigarette smoke is typically considered offensive in both physical and psychological contexts.