Hi, I'm Philipp!
A web developer who suffers
from secondhand smoking.
I made this site to help other sufferers.
And myself.
18 people said its effective against smoke! 6 said it isn't.
Users generally found it effective at reducing smoke, but some noted it takes longer for heavy smoke or persistent odors.
View on Amazon (paid link)
12 people said its effective against smoke! 5 said it isn't.
People said it performs moderately well with smoke, but may require more time to clear the air in larger spaces.
View on Amazon (paid link)
33 people said its effective against smoke! 1 said it isn't.
People said its extremely effective at removing smoke, even in dense conditions, with fast purification times.
View on Amazon (paid link)
I've analysed some air purifiers' reviews on Amazon
and found the ones where people said they worked well
against secondhand smoke.
Each of these links is an associate link.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Help me help you.
*Amazon is a company, not a woman.
The claim that even many smokers don't enjoy the smell of secondhand smoke might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, it finds support in various studies and real-world observations that highlight the complex psychological and physiological relationships smokers have with cigarette smoke.
Research has shown that while smokers are accustomed to direct smoke inhalation, many repo...
The hypothetical scenario of smokers emitting bubbles instead of smoke opens an intriguing discussion about social acceptance and perception. Smoking, often frowned upon due to its health implications and unpleasant smell, leaves a negative mark on social interactions. However, replacing smoke with harmless, transparent bubbles could drastically alter this perception.
First, we must cons...
Being constantly exposed to secondhand smoke is not only a physical health concern but can also be a mental health burden. The idea of ignoring or "not noticing" secondhand smoke through psychological tricks is an interesting one. Studies have shown that cognitive behavioral strategies can sometimes help individuals alter their perception of certain stimuli, but can these methods exte...
Throughout history, animals have occasionally displayed behaviors that resemble human habits, but smoking is not one of them. While certain animals like chimpanzees can learn by observing human actions, there is no evidence of any animal naturally engaging in smoking in the wild. However, let's explore what might happen if animals did smoke, and consider the broader topic of animals adopting human-like bad habits.
Humans have been known to provide cigarettes to animals in controlled environments or as part of ill-advised public spectacles, often leading to viral videos. For example, reports from some zoos highlight incidents where chimpanzees have been observed smoking cigarette butts discarded by visitors. Such behavior is typically imitated from humans and is usually discouraged by zoo authorities due to the potential harm to the animals and the negative impact on their natural behaviors.
In considering the hypothetical scenario where animals smoked regularly, one must consider the health impacts these habits might have. Just as smoking impacts human health, leading to respiratory issues and other serious diseases, similar effects could be expected in animals. For instance, the anatomy of a dog’s respiratory system makes them particularly susceptible to environmental pollutants, such as cigarette smoke, which is known to exacerbate allergies and cause respiratory distress in pets.
Indeed, while smoking among animals is not a natural occurrence, some behaviors might be considered 'bad habits' in the animal kingdom. For instance, animals like raccoons exhibit food-stealing behavior, famously rummaging through trash in urban areas. This can lead to issues such as obesity and illness due to the consumption of non-nutritive processed foods not typically found in their natural habitats.
Furthermore, analyzing the broader impacts of animals being exposed to smoke, researchers have looked into passive smoking and its effects on animals living in households with smokers. Studies have highlighted increased risks of nasal tumors and lung cancer in pets exposed to secondhand smoke, paralleling findings in human secondhand smoke exposure.
The concept of animals engaging in smoking provides an interesting lens through which to view how human activities influence animal behavior, and vice versa. It serves to remind us of the interconnected world we inhabit, where cross-species behaviors can emerge in unexpected and sometimes troubling ways.